Then you need to delete the svn reference with an SVN command: You will get something similarĬd /Users/UserName/Documents/Apps_Developing/. Go to Terminal - yes, the good old terminal - and go to that location.īest way just type cd then pull the folder/file to the Terminal. If you could just put back the file/folder from the trash or undo the last step when you deleted it, then. Big trouble! But you could solve it and spare time if you do it well.įirst, you need to delete the SVN reference to the file or folder before you could delete it actually If you missed it and somehow deleted it in Finder you are in trouble. so you have to do it smart!Īs you know the regular and best practice under Xcode is deleting a file on the project pane on the left. If you think that you could win with a simple magic command you are failed! SVN is really tricky and always come back somehow with a new error message in Xcode. The repository is much like an ordinary file server, except that it remembers every change ever made to your files and directories. A tree of files is placed into a central repository. Subversion manages files and directories over time.
Then run svn update -set-depth exclude on the one subdirectory you don't care about.įor TortoiseSVN, you can also do the same thing by right-clicking the folder you don't want, click on Update to revision., and then set the 'Update Depth' to Exclude, as seen in this screen shot: Subversion is a free/open-source version control system. In short, it describes this as:īeginning with Subversion 1.6, you can take a different approach. This is a client-side "update" that excludes a specific directory.
I didn't want to remove them from the repository, just from my computer - but I needed to keep the rest of the working copy in tact (thus couldn't just remove the. No matter what I did, whenever I ran an 'update' it would restore those files and bring them all back. However, I wanted to remove some branches from working copy. svn folder at the very first folder, root. I'm on subversion 1.8 and I had a working copy that only had a single. None of these answers was satisfactory for my situation.